From obligation to evidence — one connected compliance lifecycle.
Follow the shared compliance lifecycle, then explore a fictional Housing & Property example. Applicable scope, evidence quality and accountable review determine what a reported position can support.
One required inspection. A complete compliance trail.
Follow a fictional required electrical safety inspection from the applicable regulatory requirement to reviewed evidence and completed follow-up duties. The records illustrate the workflow; they are not live product screens, customer results or statutory guidance.
Harbour Housing · fictional example · select a stage
Stage 1 of 7 · Understand
Establish the context for the inspection.
Harbour Housing records property H-014, its tenancy context, responsible organisation and previous electrical safety inspection. These details inform which regulatory requirements apply.
Property H-014 Requirement R-014 Electrical safety
Property profile
Context recordedHarbour House
Residential building
Electrical safety inspection context
- Applicable rules
- Property jurisdiction pack
- Tenancy context
- Rented residential property
- Responsible organisation
- Harbour Housing
- Inspection history
- Previous report linked
A live demonstration can confirm which screens, workflows and jurisdiction packs fit your intended scope. Future industry solutions require their own development and validation.
Request a live demonstrationLess chasing. More capacity to act.
Every hour spent finding evidence, coordinating work or rebuilding reports is an hour your team could use elsewhere. Explore what reducing that administration could mean for your organisation.
Give time back to your team
Create capacity for inspections, resident needs and follow-up work within existing resources.
Make priorities clearer
Connect unresolved work, accountable owners and evidence gaps to support better resource decisions.
Bring assurance closer to the work
Build reporting from connected records and reviewed evidence, with a trail management can explain.
Your annual capacity model
Change the illustrative assumptions to reflect your operation. This models potential time released, not measured A2C results.
Enter all monetary amounts in your selected currency. Switching currency keeps your numbers unchanged; it does not apply an exchange rate. Reset example keeps your currency selection.
Count only activities where administration could be reduced.
Your estimate. Validate it against a baseline during a pilot.
Your hourly employment cost assumption, including relevant on-costs.
Potential annual capacity · your scenario
167hours
Equivalent to approximately 20.8 working days, at eight hours per day.
Annual staff capacity value
AUD 10,000
The value of time your team could redirect to higher-priority work. It becomes a cash saving only where an attributable cost is actually removed.
1,000 activities × 10 minutes ÷ 60 = 166.7 hours. Capacity value = hours × your loaded hourly cost.
Illustrative estimate before platform and implementation costs. Not a savings guarantee, staffing reduction forecast or financial ROI.
Assess financial ROI with your own benefits and costs
Use attributable financial benefits and all costs for the same 12-month period. Capacity value above is not included automatically. Include only benefits you can justify, avoid double-counting time and cash savings, and do not assign assumed savings to avoided harm or penalties.
Your evidenced or explicitly forecast cost reductions and other attributable financial benefits.
Include subscription, implementation, training, change and ongoing administration. Enter a positive total; this is not a price quotation.
Your modelled first-year ROI
—
Enter valid financial benefits and positive total costs to calculate ROI. Zero benefits are allowed.
(Benefits − total costs) ÷ total costs × 100. Negative results are shown. An estimate becomes measured ROI only when validated against actual outcomes and costs.
Turn an estimate into a decision you can defend.
Start with a scoped pilot. Agree the baseline, measure administration time and evidence-review turnaround, track overdue actions, and compare the outcomes with the full cost of adoption.
Calculator values stay in this page session and are not submitted with your enquiry.
Understand
Capture the characteristics of the regulated entity, site, facility or asset that determine what applies.
Resolve
Determine the applicable requirements using structured, versioned rules rather than assumptions held in spreadsheets.
Plan
Schedule inspections, assessments and compliance activities with owners, due dates and escalation.
Prove
Connect certificates, reports, readings and photographs directly to the requirement they evidence.
Verify
Review the evidence, confirm it satisfies the requirement and identify failures or gaps.
Correct
Manage findings and corrective actions through to verified closure.
Assure
Provide live compliance visibility, exception reporting and a defensible audit trail.
Requirements are resolved, not remembered.
Compliance rules are configurable, versioned data. Requirements are resolved from combinations of the characteristics that actually determine what applies — so a change in legislation is a rule change, not a software release.
Each industry supplies its own characteristics. A housing portfolio resolves on tenure, property type, services and fuel source; a facility resolves on operations, hazards and installed systems. The engine is the same.
Deterministic where compliance must be certain. AI-assisted where intelligence saves time.
Structured rules and verified data determine compliance outcomes. AI accelerates the work around them — it does not decide statutory compliance.
- Which requirements apply to an entity
- Frequencies, due dates and statutory windows
- Whether evidence has been verified by a person
- Compliance status and reported position
- Separation of duties on approvals
- Extracting key fields from uploaded documents
- Interpreting and summarising evidence for a reviewer
- Surfacing the relevant records for a question
- Drafting narrative from data a person then checks
- Answering questions about your own compliance records
AI output is always presented for human verification. It never closes a requirement, approves evidence or sets a compliance position on its own.
Evidence isn't storage. It's proof.
Evidence doesn't just get stored. It is connected to the requirement it proves, verified by a person, and carried through to the compliance position.
One structure, many industries.
The reason Auregis 2 Comply can support different regulatory environments without becoming a different product each time.
What the platform does today — and what's coming.
Published so buyers can tell the difference between delivered capability and roadmap. Nothing marked planned is available.
See the lifecycle running on real records.
A 30-minute walkthrough from requirement resolution to reported assurance.